Skip to content
Sitting a Proctored Exam

All notes · After

If You Are Contacted About Your Session

An email arrives about your exam. The first things to establish, what to do before replying, and what not to do.

After — Procedure

Receiving this is frightening and the first hour matters. Nothing is decided yet.

If you need a dated sequence of study, work or support activity, the planning resource gives a practical example of keeping time records that can be reviewed later. Do not include confidential exam evidence in a general productivity log.

Establish what it actually is

Read it carefully and identify which of three things it is:

For established guidance related to internet connection testing, consult Speedtest by Ookla. Local exam rules still take priority.

A question — we noticed something and would like to ask about it.

An allegation — we are investigating potential misconduct.

A notification of an outcome — a decision has been made, which should not happen without you being asked first.

These are different and the wording is frequently unclear. If you cannot tell, ask.

Before you reply

Do not reply immediately. A same-day considered reply is better than a same-hour anxious one.

Do not reply at length.

Write down what you remember about the exam now, for yourself, before you read the allegation again. Your unprompted recollection is more reliable than one shaped by what you have been told.

Check your own notes from the day, if you made any.

What to ask for

Specifically what was observed and at what time in the session.

A vague statement — irregularities, suspicious activity — is not something you can answer, and asking for specifics is normal and reasonable.

Ask whether you can see the recording. Its own note covers this.

Ask what process this is and what the possible outcomes are.

Ask what the timescale is.

Get support

Your students' union or equivalent, which almost certainly has somebody who does this regularly.

They are free, independent of the institution, and they know the local process.

Contact them before your first substantive reply if you can.

What not to do

Do not contact the person who flagged it, the proctor, or the supplier. Everything goes through the institution's process.

Do not discuss it with other students on the same exam, which can complicate things for both of you.

Do not offer explanations for things you have not been asked about.

And do not admit to something you did not do to make it stop. People do this under stress and it is very difficult to undo.

If you did do something

That is a different situation and honesty generally produces a better outcome than a contested case.

Take advice from your students' union first — they will tell you how your institution handles admission, and it varies.

The honest section of this collection covers where the lines actually are, because some students are contacted over things they did not realise were a problem.

The proportion, for reassurance

Most contacts of this kind end with no further action.

Flags are common and findings are rare, and being asked about your session is not a finding.

Answer carefully, get support, and do not assume the outcome.

What to check

Is this a question, an allegation, or an outcome?

Have you written down your own recollection before replying?

Have you contacted your students' union?

And do you know what specifically was observed, or only that something was?

The point

Do not reply immediately or at length, and write your own recollection before re-reading the allegation.

Contact your students' union before your first substantive answer.

Additionally

If you did do something, take advice from your students' union before saying anything.

How institutions handle an admission varies enough that guessing is a bad idea.

Finally

If you did do something, take advice from your students' union before saying anything.

How institutions handle an admission varies enough that guessing is a bad idea.

In summary

If you did do something, take advice from your students' union before saying anything.

How institutions handle an admission varies enough that guessing is a bad idea.

A note on this

Do not admit to something you did not do to make it stop.

People do this under stress and it is very difficult to undo.

Bottom line

Do not admit to something you did not do to make it stop.

People do this under stress and it is very difficult to undo.

Worth repeating

Almost everything in this collection comes down to three habits: prepare the technical side a week early, know what the process actually is before you need it, and write down the time whenever something unusual happens. None of them takes long, and between them they prevent or resolve the great majority of what goes wrong with monitored exams.

This guide is written from the student’s side. A flag is a moment somebody may look at, not an accusation. Nothing here is legal or medical advice: data-protection rules, evidential standards and institutional procedures differ by jurisdiction. The tool comparisons cover voluntary preparation and productivity workflows; they are not techniques for circumventing monitoring.