Patriot Act Being Used Against a 16 Year Old Boy & its Own Citizens !
Patriot Act being used against its own citizens ! Granville County, NC — On March 5 at about 10:00 PM, ten heavily armed FBI agents, accompanied by three local police officers, stormed into the home of an American family and arrested a 16 year old boy on charges he made numerous bomb threats.
The boy, Ashton Lundeby, (photo at left) was taken from his family’s North Carolina home, to a juvenile facility in Indiana where the threats were allegedly made.
During the raid, the FBI executed a search warrant and thoroughly searched the family home. They found absolutely nothing illegal or suspicious. No bombs, no bomb-making material or anything unlawful.
It turns out, someone hijacked the family’s internet IP address and used it to make numerous phone calls and terrorist threats.
The family has been told they have no rights to see their child and, under the USA PATRIOT ACT, the child has no rights to even defend himself. They claim the Constitution does not apply to this 16 year old, natural born, American citizen. THIS VIDEO IS NOT ABOUT IF ASHTON LUNDEBY MADE BOMB THREATS OR NOT !!! This story is about a serious violation of the Constitution by sworn officers of the government !!
Duration : 0:4:4
25 Responses to “Patriot Act Being Used Against a 16 Year Old Boy & its Own Citizens !”
Leave a Reply
- Fears Over Global Warming In Rapid Decline Following Climate ScandalsPublic trust in climate science at a low point, warming advocates "scared shitless" Steve Watson Prisonplanet.com Thursday, March 11th, 2010 The latest survey from Gallup indicates that Americans' fears over anthropological global warming are in rapid decline and that more and more people feel that climate change is being over exaggerated. The […]
- US budget deficit hits record high in FebruaryAFP March 11, 2010 The US government registered a record budget deficit in February, the 17th consecutive month of running in the red, the Treasury said Wednesday. The February budget shortfall was 220.909 billion dollars, a 14 percent rise from a year ago and the biggest monthly gap on record. The reading, however, was ... […]
- Jesse Ventura on The View 03 10 2010 – Gulf of Tonkin, Pat Tillman , JFK, WTC-7 and 911Youtube March 11, 2010 Jesse Ventura was on The View yesterday. The same tired comment was brought up: "why would our government do that" in regard to the 9/11 attacks. Jesse does his best but they ultimately "soundbite" him. I guess these overpaid ladies have never read army field manuals, the PNAC ... […]
- Stock Up on Incandescent Light Bulbs: In Fact, Buy a Lifetime Supply of ThemJ. Speer-Williams Infowars.com March 11, 2010 Our government’s”Green Revolution” is another covert attack on our collective health and environment, largely using their mythical global warming hoax to do so. A Compact Fluorescent Light bulb. The new Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) bulbs are a perfect example of this kind of subterfuge. While cla […]
You can’t. The …
You can’t. The patriot act needs to be repealed. They don’t have to answer to anyone about a detainee. Theres no paperwork filed. No evidence of anything. The Act operates quietly in the background.
Remember the patriot act’s entire existence is based off “detain first, figure out later”.
Just because he eventually got processed under the constitution doesn’t mean he wasn’t detained past the 24-hour limit without being charged.
get off uncle sams dick is my advice.
“and then they …
“and then they decided to process him AFTER illegally detaining under the patriot act”
then prove it. prove he was illegally detained. i am already to believe you when you prove it.
Congrats. Thats …
Congrats. Thats what I said, he was charged after he was detained under the patriot act.
I really don’t think you read the patriot act close enough. Tyrone was detained for several days before being charged. This is a use of the patriot act, which doesn’t require crimes to detain you.
“Much of the online …
“Much of the online fury was triggered by Lundebys incorrect claim, uncritically reported by the station, that the boy was being held without any legal rights on the authority of the 2001 Patriot Act. In truth, making telephone bomb threats has been a federal crime since 1939. The teenager is being held without bail in Indiana, but hes been formally charged, has a court-appointed attorney and has already made three appearances in front of a judge. Case is sealed because the suspect is a minor”
you can’t prove it. …
you can’t prove it. what part of no DUE PROCESS that tha patriot allows aren’t you understanding? He was originally detained for weeks under the patriot act provisions. after this, they decided to process him .
the patriot act is no longer relevant to his case. however you aren’t noting the fact it was used to detain him before being charged. they had no case before charging him, the patriot act allows you to buy time to do things.
god damn.
then prove it, …
then prove it, whiny lady.
this has had three court hearings (an initial appearance, detention, and transfer of venue hearing in north carolina and two hearings in indiana) at which he was represented by counsel.
You are a …
You are a moron kid. Seriously.
He was detained under the patriot act initially, which doesn’t require announcing ANYTHING to ANYONE for any reason. No charges, nothing.
and then they decided to process him AFTER illegally detaining him under the patriot act.
1:08: Kitty misses …
1:08: Kitty misses Tyrone :’(
Uniting and …
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required Act of 2001
Omg the patriot act …
Omg the patriot act being used against its OWN CITIZENS! Who else would a federal law apply to!
ArcanineTimberWolf …
ArcanineTimberWolf
wow did you know that I can’t thumbs up your comment on this video? it’s blocked.
I think they mean …
I think they mean to fear monger by messing with this kid.
why use the patriot act? no need to do that. sad stuff
wow
wow
Il find the proof …
Il find the proof then.
“Why don’t you …
“Why don’t you prove it wasn’t”
burden of proof is on you. you are the one saying his rights were violated and the patriot act was passed illegally. i am all ready to believe you if you can prove it.
Why don’t you prove …
Why don’t you prove it wasn’t? And if his rights were not violated and he was proven guilty of bomb threats then thats a good thing. So I will accept your conclusion of his guilt and rights violation.
arca, don’t start …
arca, don’t start crying like a spoiled brat.
“The fact remains that the bill was passed illegally”
then prove it. don’t keep whining and trolling like an idiot. you need to start growing up.
you are a credulous person you was just educated on this incident. you are welcome.
The fact remains …
The fact remains that the bill was passed illegally and the fact remains that you were verified last night as an idiot. Looks like my submission was verified XD
arca, you haven’t …
arca, you haven’t proven anything. prove his rights were violated. saying they were violated is not proof.
‘She is good enough proof”
that’s your opinion, not fact. getting it yet?
“You are innocent UNTIL proven guilty’
very good. do they arrest people before going to court? yes.
“Much of the online …
“Much of the online fury was triggered by Lundebys incorrect claim, uncritically reported by the station, that the boy was being held without any legal rights on the authority of the 2001 Patriot Act. In truth, making telephone bomb threats has been a federal crime since 1939. The teenager is being held without bail in Indiana, but hes been formally charged, has a court-appointed attorney and has already made three appearances in front of a judge. Case is sealed because the suspect is a minor”
1rst, my conclusion …
1rst, my conclusion was 100% true because at the time of his rights violation he was innocent, You are innocent UNTIL proven guilty. And his mother would not be so worried if he did have legal representation, he was allowed visits, and phone calls. She is good enough proof because she is an indication. Just as gravity is proof of black holes and dark matter even though we cannot see them directly we know they are there. Get it?
“The first few …
“The first few months of his arrest he had no contact with a lawyer”
according to who? his mother?
“The fact remains that for more than a month they denied him a lawyer and therefore violated his rights”
then present your proof. i am willing to believe your posts if you can present some facts, not the word of a worrisome mother.
And his guilt is …
And his guilt is not the issue for the 3rd/4th time. The initial arrest was met with violations of his rights. Period. If he is indeed guilty then he should be punished. However his rights should not have been violated. The fact remains that for more than a month they denied him a lawyer and therefore violated his rights. Any questions?
Now they did that …
Now they did that because the word got out. The first few months of his arrest he had no contact with a lawyer. His own mother said so herself.
“”Lundeby later …
“”Lundeby later acknowledged that her son was secretly Tyrone — a notorious prank phone caller who performed for a live internet audience in exchange for PayPal donations. In some recordings of calls attributed to Tyrone, the caller is heard making bomb threats”"
do some research for once, arca. this has had three court hearings (an initial appearance, detention, and transfer of venue hearing in north carolina and two hearings in indiana) at which he was represented by counsel.